The Design Criteria in Implementation of a Health Management Information System: a Case of Kenyatta National Hospital
View/
Date
2016Author
Omambia, Salim Matagi
Odhiambo-Otieno, G.W
Mwaura, Wanja
Type
ArticleLanguage
enMetadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Embracing  modern  technology  is  one  among  very  many  ways  of  improving  efficiency  and  reducing  costs  within  healthcare  organizations.  While  the  integration  of  information  and  health  services  potential  benefits  cannot be disputed, there are many challenges which affect its adoption, in fact, majority of organizations have abandoned their newly acquired systems only to go back to their old manual systems.The objective  of  this  study  was  to  determine  the  design  phase  of  the  implemented  Health  Management  Information  System  at  Kenyatta  National  Hospital.  This  study  was  a  cross-sectional  descriptive  study,  the  targeted population of the study were 35 healthcare workers who were involved in the designing of the Health Management  Information  System  at  Kenyatta  National  Hospital,  and  the  sample  technique  used  was  snowball  sampling  The  study  utilized  an  in-depth  interview  schedule  for  33  respondents  in  the  design  phase  who  were  selected  using  snow-ball,  the  data  collected  from  the  field  was  analyzed  through  the  use  of  univariete  and  bivariete  statistics. Data presentation was in form of descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution, percentages, pie charts, bar graphs and tables.  The data from the design phase were summarized in three main evaluation areas targeting the perception of the HMIS,  purposes  and  processesFrom  the  findings,  in  the  design  stage  although  the  respondents  did  not  show  systematic ordering there was evidence to the effect that the steps were followed during the design phase. From the  findings  majority  of  the  key  informants  were  able  to  define  HMIS  and  distinguish  the  key  features  of  the  HMIS. Out of the 33 participants, 13 (33.4%) reported that they knew the persons who originated the idea of the electronic  HMIS  in  KNH,  a  similar  number  were  involved  in  the  conceptualization  of  the  system,  while  4  (12.2%)  indicated  that  they  were  involved  in  designing  the  HMIS  and  18  (54.6%)  were  involved  in  implementation. Despite the general lack of knowledge on HMIS policy the informants demonstrated adequate understanding  of  the  objectives  of  the  electronic  HMIS  in  KNH.  Based  on  the  responses  obtained  during  interviews  there  were  multiple  problems  related  to  the  manual  system  that  existed  in  KNH  during  the  pre-implementation  stage  and  these  issues  served  as  the  basis  for  objective  setting  for  the  current  HMIS  in  the  hospital.  Most  key  informants  felt  that  the  hypothesized  benefits  of  the  current  HMIS  were  being  realized  including  improved  efficiency  while  four  key  informants  felt  that  the  benefits  had  been  partially  realized.  An  evaluation  of  the  manual  HMIS  was  done  during  which  deficiencies  of  the  HMIS  were  identified  through  consultations involving HMIS users and stakeholder. A HMIS needs assessment was conducted and formed the basis  of  the  electronic  system  requirements  with  specific  proposals  for  improvement  of  the  deficiencies  identified in the manual HMIS. An evaluation of the manual HMIS was done during which deficiencies of the HMIS  were  identified  through  consultations  involving  HMIS  users  and  stakeholder.  During  the  interviews  the  participants  were  able  to  highlight  various  aspects  of  the  IS  development  cycle  and  there  was  evidence  to  the  effect  that  the  steps  were  followed  during  the  design  phase  plus  an  evaluation  of  the  manual  system  was  done  during  which  deficiencies  of  the  system  were  identified  through  consultations  involving  HMIS  users  and  stakeholders.Based on the results and discussions, among the main problems that key informants described during the design phase  was  major  inefficiencies  characterized  by  evident  mismatching  of  resources  input  and  output  which  spanned several areas including time, human resources and finances however, participants were able to highlight various  aspects  of  the  IS  development  cycle  and  there  was  evidence  to  the  effect  that  the  steps  were  followed  during the design phase, planning plus an evaluation of the manual system was done during which deficiencies of   the   system   were   identified   through   consultations   involving   HMIS   users   and   stakeholders.   As   a   recommendation  we  can  say  that  NH and  the  MOH  needs  to  come  up  with  an  established  standardized  policy  for implementing interventions
URI
http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndAppliedhttp://repository.kemu.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1196
